2021年大学英语四级阅读理解模拟试题及答案(卷五) 题号 得分 一 二 三 四 五 六 总分 Sign has become a scientific hot button. Only in the past 20 years have specialists in language study realized that signed languages are unique—a speech of the hand. They offer a new way to probe how the brain generates and understands language, and throw new light on an old scientific controversy: whether language,complete with grammar, is something that we are born With, or whether it is a learned behavior. The current interest in sign language has roots in the pioneering work of one rebel teacher at Gallaudet University in Washington, D. C., the world’s only liberal arts university for deaf people.
When Bill Stokoe went to Gallaudet to teach English, the school enrolled him in a course in signing. But Stokoe noticed something odd: among themselves, students signed differently from his classroom teacher.
Stokoe had been taught a sort of gestural code, each movement of the hands representing a word in English.At the time, American Sign Language (ASL) was thought to be no more than a form of pidgin English (混杂英语). But Stokoe believed the “hand talk”his students used looked richer. He wondered: Might deaf people actually: have a genuine language? And could that language be unlike any other on Earth? It was
1955, wheneven deaf people dismissed their signing as“substandard”. Stokoe’s idea was academic heresy (异端邪说).
It is 37 years later. Stokoe—now devoting his time to writing and editing books and journals and to producing video materials on ASL and the deaf culture—is having lunch at a cafe near the Gallaudet campus and explaining how he started a revolution. For decades educators fought his idea that signed languages are natural languages like English, French and Japanese. They assumed language must be based on speech, the modulation (调节) of sound. But sign language is based on the movement of hands, the modulation of space. “What I said,” Stokoe explains, “is that language is not mouth stuff—it’s brain stuff.” 练习题:
Choose correct answers to the question:
1. The study of sign language is thought to be ________. A. a new way to look at the learning of language
B. a challenge to traditional, views on the nature of language C. an approach: to simplifying the grammatical structure of a language
D. an attempt to clarify misunderstanding about the origin of language
2. The present growing interest in sign language was stimulated by _______.
A. a famous scholar in the study of the human brain B. a leading specialist in the study of liberal arts C. an English teacher in a university for the deaf D. some senior experts in American Sign Language 3. According to Stokoe, sign language is ________. A. a Substandard language B. a genuine language C. an artificial language D. an international language
4. Most educators objected to Stokoe’s idea because they thought ________.
A. sign language was not extensively used even by deaf people B. sign language was too artificial to be widely accepted C. a language should be easy to use and understand D. a language could only exist in the form of speech sounds 5. Stokoe’s argument is based on his belief that ________. A. sign language is as efficient as any other language B. sign language is derived from natural language C. language is a system of meaningful codes D. language is a product of the brain 参考答案及解析
1.[B] 从文章第3句“手语提供了一种新方法,用以探索大脑如
何产生和理解语言,并为一个长期以来的科学争端——语言(连同语法)究竟是我们与生俱来的,还是一种我们后天学会的行为——提出了新的解释”可以看出,这是对语言的性质的传统观点的挑战,即B 。A错在learning,文章并不是在讨论语言的学习,而是语言的产生和理解;C为简单原词干扰D;中的an attempt to clarify misunderstanding是对throw new light on an old scientific controversy的曲解,因为controversy不等于misunderstanding。另外,第1段最后一句中的rebel“反叛”一词也与B中的“挑战”一致。
2.[C] 根据第1段最后一句可知,选C。题干中的was stimulated相当于原文中的has roots in。
3.[B] 根据第3段第2—4句以及最后一段第3句,可知B为答案。前者提出猜想(Might deaf people actually have a genuine language?),后者含有一个同位语 his idea that signed languages are natural languages。
4.[D] 根据最后一段第4句,可知D正确。D中的only exist in the form of speech sounds是对原文中be based on speech的同义表达。 5.[D] 根据文章最后一句,可知D正确。D中的a product of the brain是对原文中brain stuff的同义表达。B中的derived from错误,因为Stokoe认为sign language就是一种natural language。
Over the past decade, thousands of patents have been granted for what are called business methods. Amazon.com received one for its “one-click” online payment system. Merrill Lynch got legal protection
for an asset allocation strategy. One inventor patented a technique for lifting a box.
Now the nation’s top patent court appears completely ready to scale back on business-method patents, which have been controversial ever since they were first authorized 10 years ago. In a move that has intellectual-property lawyers abuzz the U.S. court of Appeals for the federal circuit said it would use a particular case to conduct a broad review of business-method patents. In Bilski , as the case is known , is “a very big deal”, says Dennis’D. Crouch of the University of Missouri School of law. It “has the potential to eliminate an entire class of patents.”
Curbs on business-method claims would be a dramatic about-face; because it was the federal circuit itself that introduced such patents with its 1998 decision in the so-called state Street Bank case, approving a patent on a way of pooling mutual-fund assets. That ruling produced an explosion in business-method patent filings, initially by emerging internet companies trying to stake out exclusive pinhts to specific types of online transactions. Later, move established companies raced to add such patents to their files, if only as a defensive move against rivals that might bent them to the punch. In 2005, IBM noted in a court filing that it had been issued more than 300 business-method patents despite the fact that it questioned the legal basis for granting them. Similarly, some
Wall Street investment films armed themselves with patents for financial products, even as they took positions in court cases opposing the practice.
The Bilski case involves a claimed patent on a method for hedging risk in the energy market. The Federal circuit issued an unusual order stating that the case would be heard by all 12 of the court’s judges, rather than a typical panel of three, and that one issue it wants to evaluate is whether it should” reconsider” its state street Bank ruling. The Federal Circuit’s action comes in the wake of a series of recent decisions by the Supreme Court that has narrowed the scope of protections for patent holders. Last April, for example the justices signaled that too many patents were being upheld for “inventions” that are obvious. The judges on the Federal circuit are “reacting to the anti-patient trend at the supreme court”, says Harole C.wegner, a patent attorney and professor at Jorge Washington University Law School. 1. Business-method patents have recently aroused concern because of
[A] their limited value to business [B] their connection with asset allocation [C] the possible restriction on their granting [D] the controversy over authorization
2. Which of the following is true of the Bilski case?
[A] Its ruling complies with the court decisions [B] It involves a very big business transaction [C] It has been dismissed by the Federal Circuit [D] It may change the legal practices in the U.S. 3. The word “about-face” most probably means [A] loss of good will [B] increase of hostility [C] change of attitude [D] enhancement of dignity
4. We learn from the last two paragraphs that business-method patents
[A] are immune to legal challenges [B] are often unnecessarily issued [C] lower the esteem for patent holders [D] increase the incidence of risks
5. Which of the following would be the subject of the text? [A] A looming threat to business-method patents [B] Protection for business-method patent holders [C] A legal case regarding business-method patents [D] A prevailing trend against business-method patents 参考答案及解析
1、选C. 细节推理题。文章第二段首句指出,“……准备对商业
方法专利进行缩减,而该类专利从其合法化的那天开始就一直充满了争议。”从此得出,现在对其进行缩减必将引起人们的“关注”。 2、选B. 推理题。该题可以采用排除法。A、C、D选项都不符合文意。
3、选C. 词汇题。“about-face”在这里是承前启后的作用,because引导的从句是对于该词所述现象的解释,“当初就是联邦组通过的此类专利……”,而第二段提到了“现在……要缩减商业方法专利”,因此是“态度”的巨大转变。
4、选B.假推理题:同义替换。从“too many patents were being upheld ”中可以找到答案,而其他三个选项在最后两段都没有被提及。
5/选D. 主旨题。文章首段介绍了“过去10年”商业方法的专利授予状况,从第二段开始转到“现状”,同时,之后的各段均表述了联邦成员组对“商业方法专利”变化的立场。
In his book The Tipping Point, Malcolm Aladuell argues that social epidemics are driven in large part by the acting of a tiny minority of special individuals, often called influentials, who are unusually informed, persuasive, or well-connected. The idea is intuitively compelling, but it doesn’t explain how ideas actually spread.
The supposed importance of influentials derives from a plausible sounding but largely untested theory called the “two step flow of communication”: Information flows from the media to the influentials
and from them to everyone else. Marketers have embraced the two-step flow because it suggests that if they can just find and influence the influentials, those selected people will do most of the work for them. The theory also seems to explain the sudden and unexpected popularity of people was wearing, promoting or developing whatever it is before anyone else paid attention. Anecdotal evidence of this kind fits nicely with the idea that only certain special people can drive trends.
In their recent work, however, some researchers have come up with the finding that influentials have far less impact on social epidemics than is generally supposed. In fact, they don’t seem to be required of all. The researchers’ argument stems from a simple observation about social influence, with the exception of a few celebrities like Oprah Winfrey—whose outsize presence is primarily a function of media, not interpersonal, influence—even the most influential members of a population simply don’t interact with that many others. Yet it is precisely these non-celebring influentials who, according to the two-step-flow theory, are supposed to drive social epidemics by influencing their friends and colleagues directly. For a social epidemic to occur, however, each person so affected, must then influence his or her own acquaintances, who must in turn influence theirs, and so on; and just how many others pay attention to each of these people has little to do with the initial influential. If people in the network just two degrees
removed from the initial influential prove resistant, for example the cascade of change won’t propagate very far or affect many people. Building on the basic truth about interpersonal influence, the researchers studied the dynamics of populations manipulating a number of variables relating of populations, manipulating a number of variables relating to people’s ability to influence others and their tendency to be. 1. By citing the book The Tipping Point, the author intends to [A]analyze the consequences of social epidemics [B]discuss influentials’ function in spreading ideas [C]exemplify people’s intuitive response to social epidemics [D]describe the essential characteristics of influentials. 2.The author suggests that the “two-step-flow theory” [A]serves as a solution to marketing problems [B]has helped explain certain prevalent trends [C]has won support from influentials [D]requires solid evidence for its validity
3. what the researchers have observed recently shows that [A] the power of influence goes with social interactions [B] interpersonal links can be enhanced through the media [C] influentials have more channels to reach the public [D] most celebrities enjoy wide media attention
4.The underlined phrase “these people” in paragraph 4 refers to
the ones who
[A] stay outside the network of social influence [B] have little contact with the source of influence [C] are influenced and then influence others [D] are influenced by the initial influential
10. what is the essential element in the dynamics of social influence?
[A]The eagerness to be accepted [B]The impulse to influence others [C]The readiness to be influenced [D]The inclination to rely on others 参考答案及解析
1、选B. 推理题。文章开头作者介绍The Tipping Point这本书的中心思想是“一小部分名人引领了社会潮流”,但是在段末又表示“书作者的想法并不能解释思想是如何传播的”,由此引出对名人在思想传播中作用的讨论。
2、选D.细节题。第二段的首句作者使用“a plausible sounding but largely untested theory”来修饰“two-step-flow theory”,同时第三段整段都是对名人思想传播论的否定。
3、选A. 推理题。文章第四段主要表述了“社会交往的影响力”。 4、选C. 指代题。定位到文章第四段,前面表述的意思为,“人们受到别人影响后会进而影响后面的人”,These people所在句子的
意思为,“有多少人注意这些人,他们与最初的那些名人一点关系也没有”,由此可知,那些人指的就是前文中所述的“受到别人影响后进而影响后人的人。”
5、选 C. 细节题。线索在文章的尾端末句“people’s ability to influence others and their tendency to be influenced”即“人们影响别人的能力及别人影响的倾向性。”,C项符合文意。
A scientist once said: “I have concluded that the earth is being visited by intelligently controlled vehicles from outer space.”
If we take this as a reasonable explanation for UFOs (unidentified flying objects), questions immediately come up.
“Why don’t they get in touch with us, then? Why don’t they land right on the White House lawn and declare themselves?” people asked. In reply, scientists say that, while this may be what we want, it may not necessarily be what they want.
“The most likely explanation, it seems to me,” said Dr. Mead, “is that they are simply watching what we are up to -- that responsible society outside our solar system is keeping an eye on us to see that we don’t set in motion a chain reaction that might have unexpected effects for outside our solar system.”
Opinions from other scientists might go like this: “Why should they want to get in touch with us? We may feel we’re more important than we really are! They may want to observe us only and not interfere with
the development of our civilization. They may not care if we see them but they also may not care to say ‘hello’.”
①Some scientists have also suggested that Earth is a kind of zoo or wildlife reserve. ②Just as we set aside wilderness areas and wildlife reserves to allow animals and growing things to develop naturally while we observe them, so perhaps Earth was set aside ages ago for the same purpose.
①Are we being observed by intelligent beings from other civilizations in the universe? ②Are they watching our progress in space travel? ③Do we live in a gigantic “zoo” observed by our “keepers,” but having no communication with them?
①Never before in our history have we had to confront ideas like these. ②The simple fact is that we, who have always regarded ourselves as supreme in the universe, may not be so. ③Now we have to recognize that, among the stars in the heavens, there may very well be worlds inhabited by beings who are to us as we are to ants.
11. People who ask the question “Why don’t they get in touch with us... and declare themselves?” think that ________.11. 提出“那么他们为什么不和我们联系呢?为什么他们不正好降落到白宫的草坪上然后自我介绍一下呢?”这些问题的人认为________.
[A] there are no such things as UFOs[A] 不明飞行物这种东西是不存在的
[B] UFOs are visitors from solar system[B] 不明飞行物是来自太阳系的探访者
[C] there’s no reason for UFOs sooner or later[C] 对于不明飞行物的说法迟早会理屈词穷的
[D] we are bound to see UFOs sooner or later[D] 人类迟早会看见不明飞行物的
[分析]本题考查的知识点是:推理引申。
根据第一、二段可知,题干中的问题是“如果将来自外太空的智能飞船正在造访地球作为对不明飞行物的合理解释”就会出现的问题。第四到七段引用科学家的话对这一问题给予了回复:对为什么人类同外星人之间没有联系进行了推测。可见,问这些问题的人并不相信外星生物或不明飞行物是存在的,而科学家的推测却在证明它们可能是存在的。故[A]选项正确。
[B]选项是根据UFOs和solar system编造的干扰项,且[B]选项本身表达亦不正确。文中指出如果外星人是存在的,那他们一定存在于太阳系之外的某个星系之中。[C]选项错在no reasons。文章第四到七段给出针对这些问题的解答,所以并非是理屈词穷。[D]选项反向干扰,从上面的分析可知提出问题的人是不相信UFOs是存在的,所以他们也不会认为迟早会见到不明飞行物。
12. According to Dr. Mead, the attitude of beings from outer space toward us is one of ________.12.米德博士认为来自外太空的生物对人类的看法会是_______。
[A] unfriendliness[A] 不友善的 [B] suspicion[B] 猜疑的 [C] superiority[C] 盛气凌人的 [D] hostility[D] 敌意的
[分析]本题考查的知识点是:推理引申。
根据题中人物关键词Dr. Mead定位到文章第五段。针对一些人提出的外星人为何不同人类接触的问题,米德博士认为最可能的解释就是他们只是负责留意我们,确保我们的行动不会触发能够危害到他们的连锁反应。由此可知,米德博士的观点是外星人对人类的态度应该是猜疑的,故[B]选项正确。
[A]、[C]选项都是其他猜测认为来外星生物会对人类所持的态度。[D]选项从文中无从推知。
13. The tone of the writer is that of ________.13. 作者的语气是________。
[A] doubt[A] 怀疑的 [B] warning[B] 警告的 [C] indifference[C] 冷漠的 [D] criticism[D] 批判的
[分析]本题考查的知识点是:作者态度。
文章第八段是作者观点的阐述。第八段第二句指出人类从未有过外星生物是否存在的想法正是人类自身的盲目优越感所致。作者认为也许正是这种盲目自大,使我们否定了外星生物的存在,但是外星生
物一定是存在于茫茫宇宙的某个星体上,他们看待我们就如同我们看待蚂蚁一般。可见本文作者所持的是批判的态度,故[D]选项正确。 [A]选项反向干扰。第八段第三句话明确指出,我们必须认识到茫茫星海中也许真的有外星生物的存在。从文中无法得出作者对否定外星人存在的人所给的警示之语,故排除[B]选项。第八段中always, supreme, have to, who are to us as we are to ants等表明了作者并不是漠然的,故[C]选项错误。
①Manners nowadays in metropolitan cities like London are practically non-existent. ②It is nothing for a big, strong schoolboy to elbow an elderly woman aside in the dash for the last remaining seat on the tube or bus, much less stand up and offer his seat to her, as he ought. ③In fact, it is saddening to note that if a man does offer his seat to an older woman, it is nearly always a Continental man or one from the older generation.
①This question of giving up seats in public transport is much argued about by young men, who say that, since women have claimed equality, they no longer deserve to be treated with courtesy and that those who go out to work should take their turn in the rat race like anyone else. ②Women have never claimed to be physically as strong as men. ③Even if it is not agreed, however, that young men should stand up for younger women, the fact remains that courtesy should be shown to the old, the sick and the burdened. ④Are we really so lost to all
ideals of unselfishness that we can sit there indifferently reading the paper or a book, saying to ourselves “First come, first served,” while a grey-haired woman, a mother with a young child or a cripple stands? ⑤Yet this is all too often seen.
①Conditions in travel are really very hard on everyone, we know, but hardship is surely no excuse. ②Sometimes one wonders what would have been the behaviour of these stout young men in a packed refugee train or a train on its way to a prison-camp during the War. ③Would they have considered it only right and their proper due to keep the best places for themselves then?
①Older people, tired and irritable from a day’s work, are not angels, either — far from it. ②Many a brisk argument or an insulting quarrel breaks out as the weary queues push and shove each other to get on buses and tubes. ③One cannot commend this, of course, but one does feel there is just a little more excuse.
①If cities are to remain pleasant places to live in at all, however, it seems imperative, not only that communications in transport should be improved, but also that communication between human beings should be kept smooth and polite. ②All over cities, it seems that people are too tired and too rushed to be polite. ③Shop assistants won’t bother to assist, taxi drivers growl at each other as they dash dangerously round corners, bus conductor pull the bell before their desperate passengers
have had time to get on or off the bus, and so on and so on. ④It seems to us that it is up to the young and strong to do their small part to stop such deterioration. 一、词汇
1.metropolitan a. 大都市的
2.practically ad. 几乎,简直,实际上 3.elbow v. 用手肘推开 4.dash n. 冲撞 5.tube n. 地铁
6.much less ad. 更不必说(何况) 7.note v. 注意 8.continental a. 大陆的 9.courtesy n. 礼貌
10.rat race卑鄙的竞争, 你死我活的竞争 11.cripple n. 跛者,残疾人 12.irritable a. 易怒的,烦躁的 13.brisk a. 敏锐的, 凛冽的, 轻快的 14.weary a. 疲倦的,厌烦的 15.shove v. 推挤
16.commend v. 委托,推荐,嘉奖 17.imperative a. 命令式的,急需的 18.growl v. 怒吠,咆哮
二、长难句
1. It is nothing for a big, strong schoolboy to elbow an elderly woman aside in the dash for the last remaining seat on the tube or bus, much less stand up and offer his seat to her, as he ought.
该句的主干为It is nothing for sb (a big, strong schoolboy) to do sth(to elbow an elderly woman aside … ),其中it为形式主语,不定式结构to do sth为真正的主语。much less用于否定句之后,表示程度减少,意为“更何况,更不用说”。句末as引导了方式状语从句,且为省略句,其完整形式是as he ought to (stand up and offer his seat to her)。
翻译:个大个头,身体强壮的男学生在冲向地铁或公共汽车的最后一个座位时,用肘部把一个老太太推向一旁,这已经不算什么了,更别指望他站起来把座位让给老太太,尽管他应该那样做。 2. In fact, it is saddening to note that if a man does offer his seat to an older woman, it is nearly always a Continental man or one from the older generation.
该句的主干为it is saddening to note that …,其中it为形式主语,that引导的从句为真正的主语。该从句为主从复合句,包含了if引导的条件状语从句。
翻译:实际上,我们悲哀地发现如果真有一个人把自己的座位让给老年妇女,那么这个人几乎总是欧洲大陆人或是老一辈的人。 3. This question of giving up seats in public transport is much
argued about by young men, who say that, since women have claimed equality, they no longer deserve to be treated with courtesy and that those who go out to work should take their turn in the rat race like anyone else.
该句的主干为This question … is much argued about,主语名词question后接有介词短语of giving up seats in public transport做后置定语。Who引导的定语从句,也做后置定语,修饰名词young men。该定语从句的主干为who (young men) say that … and that …,两个that引导的从句做say的宾语。
翻译:在公共交通工具上让座的问题常被青年人反驳,他们说,既然妇女要求平等,那么她们将不应再被礼貌对待,那些出去工作的人应该像其他任何人一样在你死我活的竞争中轮流等候。
4. Even if it is not agreed, however, that young men should stand up for younger women, the fact remains that courtesy should be shown to the old, the sick and the burdened.
该句为主从复合句。插入语however表明该句与上文之间的转折关系。句首为even if引导的让步状语从句,其主干为it is not agreed that …,it为形式主语,that引导的从句为真正的主语。主句为the fact remains that …,其中that引导的从句为the fact的同位语。 翻译:即使在年轻男子应该让位给年轻女子的做法上不能达成共识,但是对那些老人、病者和负重之人仍应给予礼貌。
5. Are we really so lost to all ideals of unselfishness that we can sit
there indifferently reading the paper or a book, saying to ourselves “First come, first served,” while a grey-haired woman, a mother with a young child or a cripple stands?
该句为主从复合句形式的疑问句。主句为Are we really so lost to all ideals of unselfishness … ,其中that引导的从句we can sit …first served,” 做后置定语,修饰名词短语ideals of unselfishness。句末为while引导的时间状语从句。
翻译:难道我们真的丧失了所有的无私思想,以至于当一位白发苍苍的老太太、一位抱着孩子的母亲或一位伤残者站在旁边时,我们仍然能够如此漫不经心地读着报纸或一本书,同时对自己说“先来,先享受”吗?
6. If cities are to remain pleasant places to live in at all, however, it seems imperative, not only that communications in transport should be improved, but also that communication between human beings should be kept smooth and polite.
该句为主从复合句,句首为if引导的条件状语从句,主句为it seems imperative not only that …but also that …,其中it为形式主语,not only… but also …连接的两个that引导的并列从句为真正的主语。
翻译:然而,如果城市还打算保持其良好的居住环境,这一点十分必要,不仅运输工具要改进,人类之间的交流也更有必要保持畅通和有礼貌。
三、文章结构分析
这篇文章以交通工具上的让座问题为切入点,主要探讨城市中的礼貌缺失现象,论证方法为说理和例证。
第一段指出现象:礼貌在大城市中已经不复存在,并以如今年轻人不给老年人让座为例说明这一情况的恶劣性。
第二段提出年轻人对不让座这种行为的解释(女性要求平等对待),作者对此进行反驳,指出这一理由不能推而广之。
第三、四段分析交通工具上礼貌缺失的潜在原因,并对其进行驳斥:第三段指出原因之一——旅行条件的艰苦,随后以难民车和战时开往集中营的车为例反驳这一理由。第四段指出原因之二——人们因工作劳累而变得疲倦和易怒,随后指出这只是一种借口。
第五段提出警告与建议:列举城市中礼貌缺失的种种表现,指出礼貌对于城市的良好居住环境十分必要,并就此提出建议——改善交通工具和人际交流。 四、试题具体分析
17. From what you have read, would you expect manners to improve among people ________?17.从文中可以推知,你会期望哪一类人的礼貌会有所改善?
[A] who are physically weak or crippled[A] 身体虚弱的人或残疾人 [B] who once lived in a prison-camp during the War[B] 战争期间曾生活在集中营的人
[C] who live in big modern cities[C] 生活于现代大城市中的人
[D] who live only in metropolitan cities[D] 只生活于大都市的人 [分析]本题所考查的知识点是:文章主旨。
此题实际上考查文章中论述现象(礼貌缺失)的主体。第一段首句指出,礼貌在伦敦这样的大都市(metropolitan cities like London)已经不复存在。第一段②③句提出交通工具上的让座问题,指出当今年轻人缺少应有礼貌。第二、三和四段对当今年轻人这一行为的理由和交通工具上让座问题的潜在原因进行分析,作者随后对这些原因进行一一反驳。第五段将现象范围扩大(cities),指出礼貌对于良好居住环境的重要性,并对此提出建议。[C]选项概括文章中的论述现象的主体(schoolboys、young men、older people、shop assistants、taxi drivers、bus conductors),为正确项。
[A]和[B]选项张冠李戴,身体虚弱的人或残疾人是应该获得礼貌对待的对象,而非需要改善礼貌的主体;第三段以难民车和集中营的人来反驳造成让座问题的原因(旅行条件艰苦),而非期望他们改善礼貌。[D]选项以偏概全,第五段将范围扩大至整个城市,而非仅局限于大都市。
18. What is the writer’s opinion concerning courteous manners towards women?18. 作者对于给予女性礼貌对待的观点是什么? [A] Now that women have claimed equality, they no longer need to be treated differently from men.[A] 既然女性宣称平等,那么她们就应该得到与男性一样的对待。
[B] It is generally considered old-fashioned for young men to give up
their seats to young women.[B] 年轻男人让座给年轻女人被认为是老旧的做法。
[C] “Lady First” should be universally practiced.[C] “女士优先”应当被广为推广。
[D] Special consideration ought to be shown them.[D] 应该给予女性特别的关照。
[分析]本题所考查的知识点是:作者观点。
文章第二段首句指出年轻人不让座的原因:女性要求平等对待。但随后②句指出,女性从未声明像男性一样强壮(,因此她们还应获得些许特别关照)。[D]选项正确。
[A]选项反向干扰,这是年轻人的观点,也是作者所反驳的观点。[B]和[C]选项从文中无从推知。
19. According to the author communication between human beings would be smoother if ________.19.作者认为人与人之间的交流将会变得更加容易,如果________。
[A] people were more considerate towards each other[A] 人们对彼此多加关照。
[B] people were not so tired and irritable[B] 人们不那么劳累和易怒。
[C] women were treated with more courtesy[C] 女性得到更多礼貌对待。
[D] public transport could be improved[D] 公共交通有所改善。
[分析]本题所考查的知识点是:作者观点。
作者以交通工具上的让座问题为切入点来探讨城市中礼貌缺失的现象。文章第二段指出,人们对于那些身处弱势的人(如女性、老人、病人和残疾人等)应当怀有无私思想,应当给予礼貌对待。[A]选项正确。
文章第四段前两句指出人们因为工作劳累而变得疲倦易怒,以至于失去礼貌,但③句则指出这只是一种借口,排除[B]选项。[C]和[D]选项以偏概全,女性只是应当获得礼貌对待的对象之一,其他对象还包括老人、病人、残疾人等;交通工具上的让座问题仅是作者例举的礼貌缺失的一种典型现象,因此改善交通工具并不能解决礼貌缺失这一整体现象。
20. What is the possible meaning of the word “deterioration” in the last paragraph?20.最后一段的词语“deterioration”的意思可能是________。
[A] worsening of general situation[A] 总体情况的恶化 [B] lowering of moral standards[B] 道德标准的下降 [C] declining of physical constitution[C] 身体素质的下降 [D] spreading of evil conduct[D] 恶劣行为的传播 [分析]本题所考查的知识点是:根据上下文推测词义。 Deterioration前有such修饰,联系上文,应当指作者前面列出的礼貌缺失的种种表现(商店售货员不愿助人,出租车司机彼此怒目而视,公共汽车售票员粗鲁举止,这种种行为体现了人们道德素质的下
降,进而说明道德标准的降低,[B]选项正确。
[A]选项范围太过宽泛,而无法具体概括文章所指出的问题。[C]选项从文中无从推知。[D]选项局限于表面,而没有深刻领会现象背后的意义。 五、全文翻译
如今,礼貌在像伦敦这样的大都市里实际上已经不存在了。一个大个头,身体强壮的男学生在冲向地铁或公共汽车的最后一个座位时,用肘部把一个老太太推向一旁,这已经不算什么了,更别指望他站起来把座位让给老太太,尽管他应该那样做。实际上,我们悲哀地发现如果真有一个人把自己的座位让给老年妇女,那么这个人几乎总是欧洲大陆人或是老一辈的人。
在公共交通工具上让座的问题常被青年人反驳,他们说,既然妇女要求平等,那么她们将不应再被礼貌对待,那些出去工作的人应该像其他任何人一样在你死我活的竞争中轮流等候。妇女从未声明像男子一样身强力壮。即使在年轻男子应该让位给年轻女子的做法上不能达成共识,但是对那些老人、病者和负重之人仍应给予礼貌。难道我们真的丧失了所有的无私思想,以至于当一位白发苍苍的老太太、一位抱着孩子的母亲或一位伤残者站在旁边时,我们仍然能够如此漫不经心地读着报纸或一本书,同时对自己说“先来,先享受”吗? 然而这却是太常见的景象了。
我们知道,对每个人来讲,旅途中的条件都是很苦的,但是艰苦确实不是理由。有时人们想知道,在一列拥挤的难民车或在战期驶往
监狱的火车上,那些强壮的年轻男子会怎样做。那时,他们会不会认为为自己留下最好的位子是正确的并且是他们的应得的权益? 老人,常因一天的工作变得劳累且易怒,他们也不会表现得如天使一般——远远不会。上地铁或公共汽车时,疲倦的人们前挤后拥,彼此推搡,许多激烈的或侮辱性的争吵就会爆发。当然,我们无法说这种现象是错是对,只是能理解疲倦是其发生的原因之一。 然而,如果城市还打算保持其良好的居住环境,这一点十分必要,不仅运输工具要改进,人类之间的交流也更有必要保持畅通和有礼貌。整个城市里,似乎人们太疲倦,太匆忙以至于做不到讲礼貌。商店售货员嫌麻烦不愿过来帮忙;出租汽车司机们在拐角处危险地冲过去时,他们会彼此大吼大叫;公共汽车售票员在拼命的乘客们尚未来得及上下车之前,拉动车铃,等等,等等。在我们看来正是年轻人和强壮者出一点力以阻止这种状况恶化的时候了。
因篇幅问题不能全部显示,请点此查看更多更全内容